Author Topic: No shaker  (Read 3652 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RENOVATIONS

  • Administrator
  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10569
  • Referrals: 0
Re: No shaker
« Reply #15 on: January 11, 2009, 12:12:49 PM »
That's not a blower.....THIS is a BLOWER  ;D




Here's the accompanying video ;)

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Half-way-through-the-the_119334.htm
Jeff

Projects:
_____________
1978 Trans Am
1970 Camaro
1970 'Cuda

Offline turbota400

  • Adv. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2527
  • Referrals: 0
Re: No shaker
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2009, 02:40:35 PM »
That is insane!!
Shawn
1972 Chevy C-10
1980 Trans Am Pace Car - 428 ci Poncho in the works
1992 S-10 2WD- Work Bomber/Gas saver
1997 Chevy X-cab 4x4 - Vortec 350

Offline Rarebird

  • Global Moderator
  • Adv. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
  • Referrals: 0
Re: No shaker
« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2009, 04:25:56 PM »
thats the same size blower used to transfer powder like material from railcars.... Have had to replace a few of these... EXTREMELY noisy and able to generate more than your standard 14.7" of vaccum.
Virgil...
1978 W72 w/M21 T/A   

Offline Justin

  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
  • Referrals: 1
Re: No shaker
« Reply #18 on: January 13, 2009, 11:16:20 AM »
  That T/A is sick. I love all those pictures. For one reason or another. I could look at cars or work on cars all day. My Fiance says I have a Chemical imbalance that makes me like cars so much. She says it has to be a disoder...Im just car crazy. What do you think?
Justin
1978 Trans Am W72
1978 Trans Am W72 WS6 Marty
1979 Trans Am WS6 403

Offline crazy2

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Referrals: 0
Re: No shaker
« Reply #19 on: January 15, 2009, 01:44:22 AM »
the gto match box car was neat ,anyone see the ford commercial that copied it? lol crappy fords

whats the law on the height stuff? (out of hood) anyway 3-4 inches ?,  there are blind spots every where,but i dont like stuff sticking out of the hood very high anyway   

Offline 1FSTLS1

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 634
  • Referrals: 0
Re: No shaker
« Reply #20 on: January 16, 2009, 08:53:34 PM »
Just watched that video Wholly Crap!!!!!
1999 Silver Z28
1981


Offline RainMan

  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5401
  • Rick
  • Referrals: 0
Re: No shaker
« Reply #21 on: January 17, 2009, 08:17:33 PM »
I just watched that video also ,interesting Guy . I love his car without the big blower ,it was to cool when he rolled it . The big blower is useless really ,as he said when he fired it up the head gaskets blew immediatly . Cool looking however

Offline turbota400

  • Adv. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2527
  • Referrals: 0
Re: No shaker
« Reply #22 on: January 17, 2009, 08:43:37 PM »
Just imagine what it would do if he could build the bottom and top end to handle that thing.
Shawn
1972 Chevy C-10
1980 Trans Am Pace Car - 428 ci Poncho in the works
1992 S-10 2WD- Work Bomber/Gas saver
1997 Chevy X-cab 4x4 - Vortec 350

Offline Rarebird

  • Global Moderator
  • Adv. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
  • Referrals: 0
Re: No shaker
« Reply #23 on: January 18, 2009, 01:16:27 AM »
Just imagine what it would do if he could build the bottom and top end to handle that thing.


The worlds 1st 700+hp leaf blower?   j/k couldnt resist Shawn
Virgil...
1978 W72 w/M21 T/A   

Offline bigty88

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 331
  • 1978 SE Y88
  • Referrals: 0
Re: No shaker
« Reply #24 on: January 18, 2009, 07:53:00 AM »
Good stuff... ;D

Tommy

Offline turbota400

  • Adv. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2527
  • Referrals: 0
Re: No shaker
« Reply #25 on: January 18, 2009, 10:51:54 AM »
LMAO At least it would be a good looking leaf blower.  Or maybe as Hammer said, it would be a 700+ horse Kenmore dryer.
Shawn
1972 Chevy C-10
1980 Trans Am Pace Car - 428 ci Poncho in the works
1992 S-10 2WD- Work Bomber/Gas saver
1997 Chevy X-cab 4x4 - Vortec 350

Offline Rarebird

  • Global Moderator
  • Adv. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
  • Referrals: 0
Re: No shaker
« Reply #26 on: January 18, 2009, 11:16:00 AM »
wouldn't want it doing a pair of my jeans... they are getting tight as it is ...lol
Virgil...
1978 W72 w/M21 T/A