Author Topic: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)  (Read 72488 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mongo

  • Ohio Firebirds
  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3558
  • THREES A CHARM
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #540 on: February 12, 2011, 03:39:45 PM »
Guess who got a new set of shoes today.  Whatta difference they make too. 


"What we're dealing with here is a complete lack of respect for the law."

Offline LOMILETA

  • Global Moderator
  • Adv. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #541 on: February 12, 2011, 03:50:30 PM »
Soory to say Fred, but the valve stem is in the wrong position. It should be at the bottom of the wheel, pointing at the A in Radial.
1978 TA-462 ci Buick (just sold)
1980 Turbo Formula
1995 Grand Prix
2002 TA convertible

Offline Mongo

  • Ohio Firebirds
  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3558
  • THREES A CHARM
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #542 on: February 12, 2011, 03:57:57 PM »
Says who?  ;D  Is that a show thing?
"What we're dealing with here is a complete lack of respect for the law."

Offline 4SPEED

  • Ohio Firebirds
  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
  • NFTAC & POCI Member
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #543 on: February 12, 2011, 04:47:32 PM »
thats 5 point at the Nats.

77 W72 TransAM  (SOLD)
79 TransAM 4SPEED

Offline Mongo

  • Ohio Firebirds
  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3558
  • THREES A CHARM
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #544 on: February 12, 2011, 05:03:26 PM »
Are you serious?  They have to be on the bottom?
"What we're dealing with here is a complete lack of respect for the law."

Offline LOMILETA

  • Global Moderator
  • Adv. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2435
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #545 on: February 12, 2011, 05:07:07 PM »
100% serious, and YES. The valve stem at the bottom and the Bird tail feathers on the center cap pointing to it
1978 TA-462 ci Buick (just sold)
1980 Turbo Formula
1995 Grand Prix
2002 TA convertible

Offline 4SPEED

  • Ohio Firebirds
  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
  • NFTAC & POCI Member
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #546 on: February 12, 2011, 05:12:47 PM »
yep if you want the points.  for some reason the Nats is like that.  POCI does not.

the nats is judged on how well your car looks.  ( as close to new show room look)  ( show stance )   POCI is how correct is your car.

77 W72 TransAM  (SOLD)
79 TransAM 4SPEED

Offline Mongo

  • Ohio Firebirds
  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3558
  • THREES A CHARM
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #547 on: February 12, 2011, 05:21:08 PM »
Well Damn.  >:(  I guess I lose out on 5 point then. Buzzkills..... ;D
"What we're dealing with here is a complete lack of respect for the law."

Offline Grand73Am

  • Adv. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2782
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #548 on: February 12, 2011, 08:55:25 PM »
Can't imagine the factory cared where the valve stem wound up in relation to the letters on the tire, if that's the reason for the points. The factory didn't even use Radial TA's did they? I thought they were all either Uniroyals or Goodyears originally.

What size tires did you get there Fred?
Steve F.

Offline pointman

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1027
  • Ohio Firebirds Member
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #549 on: February 12, 2011, 09:59:30 PM »
It's not the factory that cared, it's the Judges at Nat's that do. Attention to that kind of detail when these cars were built was never to that extreme! LOL!
Gerrit VK

78 Gold SE Y88 400 auto
79 Black 403 auto
86 Fiero SE V6
07 H3 Hummer
04 GMC Safari

Offline Mongo

  • Ohio Firebirds
  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3558
  • THREES A CHARM
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #550 on: February 12, 2011, 10:15:38 PM »
Can't imagine the factory cared where the valve stem wound up in relation to the letters on the tire, if that's the reason for the points. The factory didn't even use Radial TA's did they? I thought they were all either Uniroyals or Goodyears originally.

What size tires did you get there Fred?

P255/60R15
"What we're dealing with here is a complete lack of respect for the law."

Offline Grand73Am

  • Adv. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2782
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #551 on: February 12, 2011, 10:31:45 PM »
Thanks, they look purdy  :) .
Steve F.

Offline 4SPEED

  • Ohio Firebirds
  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
  • NFTAC & POCI Member
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #552 on: February 12, 2011, 11:09:40 PM »
Can't imagine the factory cared where the valve stem wound up in relation to the letters on the tire, if that's the reason for the points. The factory didn't even use Radial TA's did they? I thought they were all either Uniroyals or Goodyears originally.

What size tires did you get there Fred?

the Radial was used from 74  on  ,,,  the GR70-15  was till 1977. then in 78 it was the 225-70-15
and no one repros a Radial with GR70 -15  so the BFG is as correct as we can get for the look.
and no one repros the Uniroyal tire . and the tiger paw is not correct.

this is the correct tire for our t/a's till 77 


correct for 78 on is the Polysteels if your car got them.
http://www.kelseytire.com/pages/preformancetires3.html
« Last Edit: February 12, 2011, 11:20:35 PM by 4SPEED »
77 W72 TransAM  (SOLD)
79 TransAM 4SPEED

Offline hada76

  • Adv. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2808
  • '79 WS6 W72 M21
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #553 on: February 13, 2011, 12:51:43 AM »
Can't imagine the factory cared where the valve stem wound up in relation to the letters on the tire, if that's the reason for the points.

exactly...thats what makes the judging so absurd

oh, BTW mongo...nice skins
« Last Edit: February 13, 2011, 12:53:55 AM by hada76 »
'76 T/A 455 4sp   sold
'78 T/A Y88 auto  sold
'79 T/A WS6 4sp
'70 Z/28 4sp

jeff

Offline y88rick

  • Lifetime Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7708
  • f bodies suck. Don't buy one lol
Re: MY 79 RESTO PROJECT (pic heavy)
« Reply #554 on: February 13, 2011, 07:46:04 AM »
fred. nice shoes. as for the nats and that being 5 points, I would slap a judge for that if they couldnt provide documentation stating gm did this with all cars and knowing how cheaply and quickly and out of alignment they were from the factory, id fall over on a detail like that especially when they couldnt stripe an se straight if their lives depended on it. what a fricking joke.
Too many birds, not enough food.